≡ Menu

78 rpm

Retro is a thing among today’s youth: instant cameras, albums, cassettes, typewriters, 80s gaming consuls — all things hip and interesting.

As far as I can recollect, retro was not a thing for youth in the 1970s and 1980s. We were interested in classic cars, to be sure, but largely we were looking forward, toward the future.

I did possess a “retro” radio alarm clock that my grandmother owned in the 1960s. And I possessed a typewriter, but only as a necessity: computers were still new and expensive.

My most memorable foray into things retro was an acquisition of 78s, which I purchased from the school library back in the mid-1970s (I paid 50 cents). Fortunately, my family had a stereo with a setting for 78s, so I was able to play my collection of 20 or 30 discs, a collection that included Mussorgsky’s Boris Godunov, some Bach concertos, a Mozart symphony or two, compilations of organ music, and a few discs of polka (which I later decided was not to my taste).

I knew that 78 rpm was an older format, and the limits of that standard were readily apparent. I enjoyed selections as selections, but not as complete works, the running time being so limited.

I did not collect these discs to be hip, but because the discs were cheap and I liked classical music. I lamented the scratches, the skips, and having to flip discs, but I endured it all for the sake of the music. When CDs were introduced in the early 1980s, I was an early adopter. Now, Arvo Part’s Passio could be heard as one uninterrupted composition. Brian Eno’s ambient music could be enjoyed at lengthy stretches. And, despite Tom Petty’s opine, discs didn’t have to be flipped.

When introduced around the turn of the century, 78s were an improvement over previous formats. Entire worlds of music were opened to collectors who formerly were limited by the length of the recording. What today is retro was then practical.

Still, the allure of retro remains, harkening us to a time when life was different, and connecting us to experiences lost. Sometimes the past spins at 78 rotations per minute.

© 2019, Mark Adams. All rights reserved.

{ 2 comments }

The Glove Typewriter

Honestly, I can’t make this up…

From the Phonographic World, December 1891.

The Strand also mentions this item in 1897 in a piece about the evolution of the typewriter.

The Antikeychop also mentions the Gamper Glove Typewriter, which dates to 1935 (see here).

© 2019, Mark Adams. All rights reserved.

{ 4 comments }

Typewritists classified

The following, from the Illustrated Phonographic World, Sept. 1895, offers a considerably unflattering view of female typists, then called typewriters or typewritists.

Indexed at Women and the typewriter at Type-Writer.org.

© 2019, Mark Adams. All rights reserved.

{ 2 comments }

1896: The chief requisites of a typewriter

From The Book-Keeper (Detroit), May 1896 —

© 2019, Mark Adams. All rights reserved.

{ 2 comments }

A Yost boast

“Any one who has tried to do pen writing in a railway train knows that the scrawl which results is anything but satisfactory” — but on a Yost, very satisfactory!

The Illustrated Phonographic World (New York), October 1894 —

© 2019, Mark Adams. All rights reserved.

{ 1 comment }